Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee And Manifest Destiny

Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee and Manifest Destiny Amanda Grav Manifest Destiny could be described as the European-White Man’s belief that they were destined to settle the land that now accounts for America. In Dee Brown’s telling, he describes the relationships of the Native Americans, the settlers of the states, and the United States government in a factual, yet emotional description. In Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, his stance is explained, as well as the background for his story. Accounts of life have been retold thousands of times from the perspective of traders, ranchers, wagon trains and gold-seekers; the story that oftentimes fails to be told, is that of the American Indian. Brown’s outline of the position of diverse western tribes in 1860 does not include a description of their fates thirty years later. However, by focusing not on the steady growth of white civilization westward from the Atlantic Coast but on the equally steady decline of Indian civilization, Brown signals his intent to make his history of the West tragic rather than celebratory. This focus on the fate of the Indians of the West was very unusual; Brown’s book was one of the first histories of the West to give its readers the American Indians’ perspective on how the West was won or, as he would probably say, how the West was lost. Readers learn of General Carleton’s ferocity against the Indians and his great hunger for tribal land and the minerals found on it. This, together with the settling ofShow MoreRelatedBury My Heart At Wounded Knee Essay1490 Words   |  6 PagesThe book Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee was written by Dee Brown. Dee Brown wrote a handful of books and the central theme around those books were tales of Native Americans and civil war stories. He spent a long time studying different tribes all around the United States. He has brought out the voice of the Native Americans which was muffled and silenced by the army and government. This book brought much awareness to a cause many had forgot ten about, and to the shock of many when they realized heRead MoreComparison Of Treatments Of Native Americans In The East And West1573 Words   |  7 Pagesthey witnessed the Mexican-American War. The Navajo and Mexicans had been at odds with each other long before the Europeans came to the Americas. At the end of the Mexican-American War the Mexicans we considered American citizens and were protected my the Americans. Over the next ten years Americans built forts in New Mexico in traditional Navajo territory. The Americans signed peace treaties with the Navajo chiefs such as Manuelito. The soldiers at Fort Defiance in New Mexico prohibited ManuelitoRead MoreSummary of Bury My Heart and Wounded Knee4423 Words   |  18 PagesProject In English Submitted by: Tham Allen A. Cartagenas III à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" St. James Submitted to: Sir Jerico Irinco Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee By Dee Brown Table of Contents 1. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: Introduction 2. Dee Brown Biography 3. Oneà ¢Ã‹â€ Ã¢â‚¬â„¢Page Summary 4. Summary and Analysis 5. Quizzes 6. Characters Introduction Dee Browns Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee was first published in the United States in 1970. This landmark bookà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬ which incorporated a number of eyewitness accountsRead MoreSummary of Bury My Heart and Wounded Knee4415 Words   |  18 PagesProject In English Submitted by: Tham Allen A. Cartagenas III – St. James Submitted to: Sir Jerico Irinco Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee By Dee Brown Table of Contents 1. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: Introduction 2. Dee Brown Biography 3. One−Page Summary 4. Summary and Analysis 5. Quizzes 6. Characters Introduction Dee Browns Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee was first published in the United States in 1970. This landmark book—which incorporated a number of eyewitness accountsRead MoreAnalysis Of Howard Zinn s A People s History Of The United States 2266 Words   |  10 Pagestheir lands, carelessness and failure by the American government to protect, and multiple slaughters carried out by the American military on the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek, Choctaw, Sac and Fox, and the Seminole tribes. Closely related is â€Å"Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee,† written by Dee Brown, his writings from chapter thirteen focus on the Nez Perces tribe that resided in Oregon, and their attempt at a journey in Canada, and other western Indian tribes’ affairs. To go along with Zinn and Brown, is AlanRead More Decline of Indian Southwest Essay2653 Words   |  11 Pagestribes. Kit Carson’s actions and the actions of others began the deterioration of the Indian culture in the southwest. The decline of the Indian southwest was caused by the idea of Manifest Destiny, which led to Indian confinement to reservations and the decline of Native American society. The idea of Manifest Destiny led the Americans to war with Mexico. In 1846, America gained control of what is now the Southwest. With this acquisition, America inherited years of Navajo-Mexican warfare. The MexicansRead MoreEssay Native American Relations with The United States4012 Words   |  17 Pages1845 issue of The United States Magazine and Democratic Review, the term ‘‘manifest destiny† is first used. John O’Sullivan, editor, described the United States’, â€Å" Manifest destiny [is] to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.† (Schlesinger 249) The discovery of gold in California in 1849 initiated a flood of immigration west. The manifest destiny of the white man further reduced Indian lands west of the Mississippi as oneRead MoreSystematic Racism of Native Americans2611 Words   |  11 Pagesunproductive, unless there are minerals discovered that the United St ates didnt know about when it set aside the land. Everything they had or now need has been taken from them, which as a result, ends in high unemployment and poverty. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, by Dee Brown, and From a Native Son, by Ward Churchill are good sources to understand the true history of Native Americans, and to learn how they are treated today. To understand how it was possible for anybody to be treated so cruellyRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesthat lie at the heart of effective, satisfying, growth-producing human relationships. Freedom, dignity, trust, love, and honesty in relationships have always been among the goals of human beings, and the same principles that brought about those outcomes in the eleventh century still bring them about in the twenty-first century. Despite our circumstances, in other words, and despite the technological resources we have available to us, the same basic human skills still lie at the heart of effective human

The Theme of Racism in To Kill a Mockingbird Essay

In the book To Kill a Mockingbird, many minor themes are present such as gender and age. However, the largest and therefore major theme of the book is racism. All of the events and themes in the book had only one purpose, to support the theme of racism. One of the most important events in the book was Tom Robinson’s trial, which was unfairly judged due to the fact that the jury could not see beyond the color of Tom’s skin. The put their own racist opinions ahead of what is right and just. One of the most important events in the novel circulated around racism. However, the most focused on point of Tom’s life was not the only point in his life where racism has been shown towards him. The Ewell’s are a major source of racism towards Tom.†¦show more content†¦This was unlike how African-Americans would act during this time-period. They would have a specific way of speaking without proper grammar. This was shown by the attitude and behavior by the members in the church. During church, if Calpurnia had acted proper she would have been seen as acting like a Caucasian and seen as racist. To prevent this, she acted like everybody else. Calpurnia’s son Zeebo is another example of racism. In everyday society, he is seen as just a low garbage man however, in church he is one of the most important figures as he is one of only four members of the church who can read. In addition, he leads the hymns since he can read. In the church, the method used for the hymns is the repeat after me method. Zeebo starts a line of the hymns and the line is the repeated by the rest of the church. Instead of just being a lowly garbage man, which is what the Caucasian population of Maycomb County, sees him, as he is a very important figure in the eyes of the African- American church members. Although racism was commonly present in Maycomb County, many individuals were non-racist. One example of this was Atticus. Atticus was a prime example of non-racism in the novel. He was one of the few homeowners who appreciated his African-American housekeeper; he treated Calpurnia as a person and was humane to her. In most cases, the homeowner would be mean to her however, since Atticus was non-racist, he was kind to her. In addition, he evenShow MoreRelatedTheme Of Racism In To Kill A Mockingbird1340 Words   |  6 Pages1930’s. Racism is a major aspect in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird. The main character, Scout, has to deal with this problem everyday. Bob Ewell, Mr. Cunningham, and other characters are very racist, and don’t approve of Atticus defending a â€Å"Negroe†. This causes Scout to be bullied in school and even attacked by Mr. Ewell. Also, characters such as Tom Robinson are negatively affected by racism in Maycomb. Tom is killed just because of h is skin color. In the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, HarperRead MoreTheme Of Racism In To Kill A Mockingbird1450 Words   |  6 Pages Ingrained Racism â€Å"Remember it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird...Mockingbirds don’t do one thing but make music for us to enjoy† (Lee 119). The white community sinned and the black community suffered as an innocent mockingbird was killed. Although innocence is one recurring theme in Harper Lee’s novel, it seems as though it only mattered to her. Lee illustrates the widespread racial discrimination and oppression that developed in every social class of Maycomb, Alabama. Mulligan’s interpretation howeverRead MoreTheme Of Racism In To Kill A Mockingbird1776 Words   |  8 PagesSUBJECT To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee is set in Maycomb County, Alabama in the 1930s, during the Great Depression. It is a time of racism, opinionated communities, and poverty. Scout and Jem Finch face several conflicts throughout the novel and are forced to mature quickly. Atticus Finch, the father of Jem and Scout, also faces a major difficulty which will affect his family and the town he lives in. Atticus Finch is a lawyer in Maycomb, and is given the responsibility to support the defendantRead MoreTheme Of Racism In To Kill A Mockingbird1015 Words   |  5 PagesMiss Caroline. Throughout the novel of To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus keeps pressing this idea to Scout and to Scout’s brother, Jem, as Atticus defends a black man in court against the racism of the whole town. The theme that one can’t fully understand another until one attempts to, â€Å"‘climb inside of his skin and walk around in it’† (Lee 33) is demonstrated through Scout’s anguish over Jem’s increasing maturity, Atticus’ explanation for violence and racism in the mob, and Scout’s empathy for ArthurRead More Racism in Literature Essay1144 Words   |  5 PagesRacism, a disease of the ignorant, is a horrific part of society, and has reared its ugly head throughout history, and is continuing to do the same today. Racism comes in many shapes and forms, directed towards a variation of cultures. It can end lives and tear communities apart. Often times, there are people who see racism, and are inspired to write about it, with the goal in mind to make a difference and change societies belief. Abel Meeropol and Harper Lee had that goal in common, when writingRead MoreWhy Is Innocence Becomes Experience?1225 Words   |  5 PagesIn To Kill A Mockingbird there are several reason why innocence becomes experience. Phys.com stated â€Å"Between ages 5 and 11, the researchers found, children become aware that many people believe stereotypes, including stereotypes about academic ability. When children become aware of these types of bias about their own racial or ethnic group, it can affect how they respond to everyday situations.† This shows that Scout and Jem are in a time of their lives when racism will take effect. Not only becauseRead MoreTheme Of Symbolism In To Kill A Mockingbird791 Words   |  4 PagesTo Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is a multi-faceted novel which explores the principles and morals of people in the South during the 1930s. Mockingbirds are symbolic of the people that society abuse. Lee narrates the events of the novel using Scout’s voice and uses this technique to add emotional context and develop themes. Themes of racial and classist prejudice are developed by Lee to challenge the reader. These techniques are all powerful ways to alter the views of the reader. MockingbirdsRead MoreAnalysis Of Harper Lee s Kill A Mockingbird 1491 Words   |  6 PagesHarper Lee’s ​ To Kill a Mockingbird ​ is a critically acclaimed, Pulitzer Prize winning novel that instantly attained its position as one of the greatest literary classics (Editors).The story of Scout Finch’s childhood has become one of the most notable narratives that addresses controversial issues present in the early 20th century. Lee’s novel depicts themes of race, justice, and innocence throughout the novel. Although ​ To Kill a Mockingbird​ is regarded as a literary masterpiece in AmericanRead MoreKill A Mockingbird, By Robert Mulligan941 Words   |  4 Pages To Kill A Mockingbird In the movie To Kill a Mockingbird directed by Robert Mulligan portrays a story about a small town lawyer, who has taken upon himself to prove that Tom Robinson was innocent of raping a young woman by the name of Mayella Ewell. The only problem that Atticus faced was Tom Robinson was an African American at a time where racism was big, especially in the 1930’s. Atticus goes above and beyond to try and prove he was innocent. The end result was that Tom Robinson was guilty andRead MoreThe South : Controversial Topics On Harper Lee s Kill A Mockingbird1475 Words   |  6 Pagesin Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird is a critically acclaimed, Pulitzer Prize winning novel that instantly attained its position as one of the greatest literary classics (Editors).The story of Scout Finch’s childhood has become one of the most notable narratives that addresses controversial issues present in the early 20th century. Lee’s novel depicts themes of race, justice, and innocence throughout the novel. Although To Kill a Mockingbird is regarded as a literary

Convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility. Answer: Introduction: There are two issues present in the case of the Cassimatis. The issues are as follows: whether the alleged Storm Company had breached any provisions of the Corporation Act 2001 or not. whether the Directors of the company had complied every duty regarding the Corporation Act or not. It is to be clarify that Corporation Act is regulated the provisions of the company related matters in Australia. Under the Act, numerous provisions are engraved that are pointing out the liabilities of the directors in a company. There are certain conditions regarding the directors duties are mentioned under section 180 of the said Act. In the present case, these issues are raised regarding the violation of those duties and necessary consequences of it. Topic of the case is based on certain provision of the Corporation Act 2001[1]. The subject matter of the case is based on the directors duty towards the stakeholders. Rules regarding the same have been mentioned under the provision of section 180 of the said Act[2]. There are certain sub-sections are included. As per section 180 (1) of the Act, a director of a company must show necessary diligence while performing his duties and he owes care to the shareholders and the other stakeholders[3]. In ASIC v Adler, certain principles of the Corporation Act has been stated and a detailed version regarding the relevant sections have been mentioned[4]. In the case, there was a breach made by the Director of the company took place. The sections related to the case were section 9, section 180, section 180 (1), section 182, section 182 (2) and section 183 of the Corporation Act 2001. The meaning of the term care includes the reasonable supervision on the shareholders in case of all circumstances . The applicability of the section in this case is wide in nature. Reasonable supervision means he is not allowed to take any steps that is wrong in nature or to feather his own nest. The director of a company should not hide any facts from the shareholders or other stakeholders. Under section 184 of the Corporation Act, it has been stated that the directors should have to perform their duties in good faith. There shall be no bad intention or ulterior motive behind the acts of the directors. It is not expected from the director of the company to misuse the post to earn benefits. In Corporation Act, there is a provision regarding section 1041H has been mentioned that states the liability of the director in the finance sector. In ASIC v FMG (2011) 190 FCR 370, it was held that the director should not deceive the shareholders to gain certain privileges in the financial service sector[5]. It is mentioned under the section that if any person violate the principle laid down under the subsection, provision of the civil liability will be applicable on him and he will be prosecuted under the provision of section 1041I of the Corporation Act 2001[6]. Certain pecuniary penalties will be imposed on the directors under section 674 (2) of the said Act. According to the wise interpretation of section 180 of the Act states that the provision is also applicable on the sole directors of a company so that they could not use the same as an excuse[7]. The reason behind the enactment is to secure the interest of the shareholders. It is duty of the director to disclose all necessary information related to the company as well as the risks of the company to shareholders and other interested person. In ASIC v Macdonald [2009] MelbULawRw 34, it was observed by the Supreme Court if the allegation against a director regarding non-disclosure of necessary documents has been proved, he should be liable under section 180 of the Corporation Act 2001[8]. However, amount of loss is not mandatory in this case. In ASIC v Hellicar Ors [2012] HCA 17, it was held that the liabilities of section 180 are not comprised of certain statutory duties only. Provision of section 945A of the Act is applicable in this case to certain extent. However, the section has b een repealed now. In Australia, there are number of cases pending regarding the company matters[9]. As it is a business country, company matters are placing in a most important position. There are number of cases where the various provisions of the Corporation Act prevail by the decision of the courts[10]. The present case is one the most important cases in this regard where the provision of directors duty enlarged and the relevant sections are interpreted and applied. The brief summary of the case is that Mr. Mrs. Cassimates were the sole director of the Storm company and published a scheme that attracts the creditors to invest in this. However, he had failed to inform them about the risks of such investment and a number of shareholders were invested their money in the fund. According to Australian Security and Investigation commission, the whole project was drowned due to certain financial crisis and a serious break down occurred in the company[11]. All the investors had faced a lot of trouble and the directors were held liable under section 180 of the Corporation Act for breach of directors duty. Another allegation made against the directors that they had not abided by all the provisions that should be maintained by the director while performing their job. It was stated by the ASIC that Mr. Cassimates wanted to gain certain benefits from the Storm project and that is why he had convened the investors to invest money in it. The problem arises as he had not inquire into the matter related to the background of the shareholders and did not even stated about the risks that may take place in this regard[12]. The shareholders had invested their money in it with a hope to gain some profit as the company was a reputed company in the financial sector. As per the principle laid down under the case of ASIC v FMG (2011) 190 FCR 370, a director must know about the potential risks regarding the financial investment and it is his duty to inform the shareholders regarding the same[13]. If he fails to perform the duties, he shall be held liable for the breach of Directors duties. As per the judgment made in ASIC v Macdonald [2009] MelbULawRw 34, it can be stated that the directors of the Storm Company had failed to disclose necessary documents to the sh areholders and after the break down, they had not shown possible care to them. There was no step had been taken by them to refund the invested money and the effect of the act was detrimental in nature. On the other hand, the directors of the company had expressed their view regarding the exception of section 180 of the Corporation Act by stating the various aspects of the sections and its applicability. It has been stated by them that they will not be liable under section 180 as the section is not deal with the sole directors. It has been stated by them that risks are the inevitable part of the financial business. It is common in nature and there is no necessity to let the investors know about it. They knew the facts when they are investing their money in the project. Therefore, the allegation made against by them was vague in nature and they shall not be prosecuted under the provision of the Corporation Act 2001. However, in this case, there were many scopes to identify the various provision of the Corporation Act 2001. The learned court had made an attempt to interpreted the relevant provisions of the Corporation Act 2001 by citing many cases regarding the matter[14]. The precedents of the cases were enlightened the provisions of the case too. It was observed by the Court that the main objective of section 180 is that the directors should have to show minimum care to the shareholders and there was no provision regarding the specific classes of directors[15]. Here the rules are applicable on every director including the sole directors. As per the allegation made by ASIC and the evidences presented before the court ion this regard, it can be stated that Mr. Mrs. Cassimates had failed to perform their duties properly and had failed to show sufficient care to the shareholders. They had failed to make a balance between the risks and had failed to narrate the same to the investors. It is an excus e that the investors must know about the risk of the investment. It is the duty of him to state about the facts to the shareholders. As regards the other allegation, there were sufficient prove regarding the fact that the directors of the company had failed to meet the requirements of the Corporation Act and did not tried to make an inquiry about the background of the investors. It had been stated during the cross examination that the shareholders had to face serious mishap regarding the break down and many of them became insolvent. However, there were the directors of the company regarding the beneficiary of the shareholders had taken no attempt[16]. Therefore, the case can be concluded with the facts that there were every evidences present against the directors of the company and regarding the violation of the necessary provision of the Corporation Act 2001. The violated provisions were section 180(1), section 182, and section 183 of the Corporation Act. Good faith had also not maintained by the directors of the company. The court was pleased to held the directors of the company liable for the misconduct. The second question is based on the proprietary company. Under the Corporation Act, there are number of provisions made regarding the rules of the company. It is a common rules regarding the proprietary company is that every partners of the company can be the directors as well as the shareholders of the company and their activities will be regulated by the constitution of the company[17]. The rules laid down under the constitution will be applied on them and if there is any changes required regarding the constitution, the same can be done as per the rules mentioned under the Corporation Act. The constitution of the company can be changed by way of special resolution where there is a need of 755 of votes as against the same. The constitution works as a communication between the directors and the shareholders. Therefore, in case of the voting content, both the directors and the shareholders are taking part in it[18]. Section 201H of the Corporation act deals with the appointment process of the directors of a proprietary company. It has been stated under the section that the directors must meet the resolution process regarding the same and the other directors here can appoint any of the director[19]. The notice of the appointment should be served within two months. Once a director is appointed, there are certain rules regarding his removal from the post have been stated. The Corporation Act has stated certain strict provisions regarding the norms of a proprietary company. It has been stated under the rule that the director of a proprietary company can be removed from his post according to the provision stated in the constitution of the company. In the present case, it can be observed that the clause 9k prescribed certain procedures regarding the removal of the directors of the company. The other directors of the company had decided to remove Kanye from his post of directorship. It should be mentio ned in this regard that the other directors of the company can remove him if there is any express provision mentioned under the constitution regarding the power of the directors to do so. Corporation Act deals with the removal of directors of a proprietary company under the provision of the Section 203C. However, there is a provision mentioned under the constitution of the company that if during the removal process, all the requirements are not maintained, the same can be violated the rules of the natural justice and could attract the provision of the unfair dismissal law. Under section 229H(1) of the Corporation Act has stated the voting system of the shareholders regarding the removal of the directors by way of an extraordinary general meeting. A notice should have been served under section 203D(2) of the Corporation Act. As per the contention of section 249A of the said Act, all the consenting shareholders and the directors should sign the notice. However, kanye was removed from his post without maintaining all these rules and therefore, there is a scope for him to take necessary steps regarding the same as against the directors and the consenting members as a whole. It is necessary to state that the directors of a proprietary company can be removed from his post if the ASIC form 484 has been filled up properly in this regard. However, there is no mention about the fact that the same rule has been followed in the case of Kanye. It has been stated earlier that the every director of the proprietary company has certain shares in the company. These rights over the shares cannot be terminated for the facts that he is no longer a director of the company[20]. Therefore, if there is any attempt made regarding depriving Kanye from the rights that are accrued by him regarding the shares, the same will be treated as illegal in nature. The share interest of the directors is mentioned under section 196 of the Corporation Act 2001. If there is a violation regarding the same can be made, Kanye has all the rights to claim damage from the other directors of the company. The second part of the question is based on the provision of the directors duty. In Corporation Act, there are certain provision regarding the breach of directors duties is mentioned. It is mentioned that the director of a company should show certain diligence not only towards the shareholders, but to the other directors of the company too. The word diligence means the persistent effort[21]. Every director of a company shall be under the liability of certain facts that are particularly mentioned in the several provisions of the Corporation Act. Every director should be under an obligation of section 181 of the Corporation Act. Director holds an important part in case of the internal proceeding of a company. Therefore, it is their duty to maintain a good communication link in between the shareholders and the other staff. Therefore, good faith is necessary regarding the same. In case of the Koala Pty Ltd, there is a lack regarding the requirements of these rules have been observed. As per the statements of the case, there is an applicability of the principles stated under section 182 and section 183 has been observed[22]. It has been mentioned under section 182 of the Corporation Act that should not misuse his position at any cost and should maintain the good faith criteria regarding the interest of the office. The composition of a company is inter-related to each other, and it is the duty of the members of the company to look into the matters carefully so that there shall not be any breach take place. During the office work, a director should not misbehave with the other directors and should not do anything that can affect the interest of the company. The directors are the part of the company and they should act diligently while dealing with the affairs of the company[23]. In the present case, two of the directors of the company, Keith and Kylie decided to incorporate another company and the business nature of such company will be similar in nature. It has also been decided by them that none of the other two directors of the present company be the member or director of the company. There is a scope regarding the violation of section 182 of the Corporation Act observed. The relevant provision of the Corporation Act has stated that the director of a company needs to disclose all the relevant facts and the documents to the other co-directors. In the present case, there is a tendency regarding the hiding of the facts to incorporated similar kinds of company by Kieth and Kylie observed and it has also been stated that the duo directors were planned to avoid other two directors of the company. According to the provision of section 183 of the Corporation Act, a director of a company should not gain unnecessary advantage during the performance of duties. It is their duties to avoid any such work, where the interest of the company is directly involved. However, in the present case, the same situation has been cropped up when both the directors of the company have decided to set up another company without informing the other directors of the company[24]. If there is an allegation brought against the director of a company regarding the violation of the norms of the Corporation Act and the same has been proved, he will be prosecuted under section 1317E of the Corporation Act. Therefore, Khaled and Kylie can bring action against the other directors under the similar provision of the Corporation Act. Reference: Aroney, N., Gerangelos, P., Murray, S., Stellios, J. (2015).The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia: History, Principle and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press. Barnett, H. (2017).Constitutional and administrative law. Taylor Francis. Berk, J., DeMarzo, P., Harford, J., Ford, G., Mollica, V., Finch, N. (2013).Fundamentals of corporate finance. Pearson Higher Education AU. Blair, M. M. (2015). 12. Boards of directors and corporate performance under a team production model.Research Handbook on Shareholder Power, 249. Chia, H. X., Ramsay, I. (2015). Section 1322 as a Response to the Complexity of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Coffee Jr, J. C., Sale, H., Henderson, M. T. (2015). Securities regulation: Cases and materials. Crane, A., Matten, D. (2016).Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Dawkins, Cedric E. "The principle of good faith: Toward substantive stakeholder engagement."Journal of Business Ethics121.2 (2014): 283-295. Ferran, E., Ho, L. C. (2014).Principles of corporate finance law. Oxford University Press. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J. (2015).Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education. Hargovan, A. (2017). Corporate law: Judicial guidance on de facto director liability for insolvent trading.Governance Directions,69(2), 111. Hedges, J., Bird, H. L., Gilligan, G., Godwin, A., Ramsay, I. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of Public Enforcement of Directors Duties in Australia: Preliminary Findings. Keane, A., McKeown, P. (2014).The modern law of evidence. Oxford University Press, USA. Laing, G., Douglas, S., Watt, G. (2015). Aspects of Corporate Delegation, Reliance and Financial Reporting: Lessons from Australian Securities and Investments Commission v. Healey.Canberra L. Rev.,13, 16. Langford, R. T. (2015). Directors' Duties: Conflicts, Proactive Disclosure and S 181 of the Corporations Act. Langford, R. T., Ramsay, I., Welsh, M. A. (2015). The origins of company directors' statutory duty of care. Pearson, G. (2016). Failure in corporate governance: financial planning and greed.Handbook on Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions, 185. Rahim, M. M., Alam, S. (2014). Convergence of corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in weak economies: The case of Bangladesh.Journal of Business Ethics,121(4), 607-620. Roach, L. (2016).Company Law. Oxford University Press. Sealy, L., Worthington, S. (2013).Sealy Worthington's Cases and Materials in Company Law. Oxford University Press. Sime, S., Taylor, M. (2015).Company Law in Practice. Oxford University Press. Starbuck, William H. "Why corporate governance deserves serious and creative thought."The Academy of Management Perspectives28.1 (2014): 15-21. Tills, M., Wills, C. (2016). Corporate law: Directors found guilty of breaching duties following corporation's breaches.Governance Directions,68(10), 624. Tricker, R. B., Tricker, R. I. (2015).Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA.